Skip to content
Public Media NetworkPublic Media NetworkPublic Media Network
  • Local News & Stories
  • Watch
    • TV Schedules
    • Live Streams
    • OnDemand
    • PMN+ App
  • Government
  • Create
    • Find your role at PMN
    • Become a Content Creator
    • Media Arts Lab
    • Youth Media
    • Partner with us
    • mediaImpact
  • Support
    • Donate
    • Volunteer
    • Sponsorship Opportunities
  • Make a difference
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Font ResizerAa
Public Media NetworkPublic Media Network
  • Local News & Stories
  • Watch
  • Government
  • Create
  • Support
  • Make a difference
  • Local News & Stories
  • Watch
    • TV Schedules
    • Live Streams
    • OnDemand
    • PMN+ App
  • Government
  • Create
    • Find your role at PMN
    • Become a Content Creator
    • Media Arts Lab
    • Youth Media
    • Partner with us
    • mediaImpact
  • Support
    • Donate
    • Volunteer
    • Sponsorship Opportunities
  • Make a difference
Public Media Network > Blog > Video > What Does “Affordable” Actually Mean? A Kalamazoo Panel Digs In
Video

What Does “Affordable” Actually Mean? A Kalamazoo Panel Digs In

By
Matt Schuster, PMN Creator
4 months ago
4 Min Read
Share
SHARE

On a cold winter evening at the Kalamazoo Public Library, a room full of residents, journalists, and community leaders sat down to wrestle with one of the region’s most persistent challenges: housing that people can actually afford.

The Southwest Michigan Journalism Collaborative hosted The Affordable Housing Conundrum: New Partners & Creative Solutions, a panel moderated by Gordon Evans of WMUK. Six panelists, including journalists and community practitioners, brought perspectives ranging from rural St. Joseph County to Battle Creek to downtown Kalamazoo.

One of the evening’s first insights came early: the word “affordable” carries a lot of weight, and not always the same weight. Panelist Alek Haak-Frost noted a significant gap between how housing policy defines affordability and what that actually means for someone earning a local wage. In places like Three Rivers and Sturgis, lower rents sound like good news until you factor in lower wages, and the result is a housing market that still doesn’t work for many residents.

The conversation moved through the post-pandemic housing market, where first-time buyers compete against cash offers from investors, and aging housing stock makes renovation costly and complicated. Panelist ordyn Hermani observed that the tone around affordable housing has been shifting as more communities are willing to talk about systemic solutions rather than individual circumstances.

Several panelists pointed to collaboration as the most underused tool available. Shanay Settle described how organizations in Battle Creek deliberately pool resources and focus efforts geographically — targeting specific neighborhoods rather than spreading thin across the region. Sister Patsy Moore shared the story behind a senior living development, describing years of bureaucratic obstacles eventually overcome through the right partnerships.

The panel also took on NIMBY opposition directly. Gwendolyn Hooker discussed the challenges of placing innovative projects, including tiny homes designed for people recovering from substance use disorders, in communities where neighbors resist. One response gaining traction: “Yes In God’s Backyard,” a movement encouraging churches to use their land for housing. Panelists noted that zoning reform, community dialogue centered on facts and dignity, and local election outcomes all shape what’s possible.

Brad Devereaux and others addressed the economics head-on: in most cases, building truly affordable housing requires subsidies. The math simply doesn’t work without them. That means government support, philanthropy, and mission-driven developers who aren’t optimizing purely for profit.

An audience member raised a question that hung in the room: what does the new Kalamazoo Event Center mean for housing affordability in nearby neighborhoods like the Northside? A panelist’s response was direct: the arena creates jobs, and housing should have been built first to support those workers, not after.

The evening closed with panelists sharing what they hope to see in five years: more units, better wages, fewer stereotypes about the unhoused, and more counties, cities, and townships working together instead of past each other.

Share This Article
Facebook Flipboard Pinterest LinkedIn Reddit Email Copy Link Print
Previous Article Person at a podium presents to DDA members seated at a curved dias Comstock Township has a Downtown Development Authority. Here’s what that means and why it matters for your neighborhood.
Next Article Committee members and staff discuss an agenda item while seated at the dias. WMU wants to add lights for night soccer. A city committee is asking questions.
- Public Media Network Supports -
Ad image

Public Media Network

  • About
  • Meet the Team
  • Board of Directors
  • History
  • Financials
  • Contact

Watch

  • Live Streams
  • PMN OnDemand
  • PMN+ App
  • Archive

Create

  • Become a Creator
  • Content Studio
  • mediaImpact
  • Media Arts Lab
  • Youth Media
  • Creator Access Portal
  • Share Your Videos

Support

  • Make a difference
  • Volunteer
  • Newsletter
  • PMN Community Partner
Public Media NetworkPublic Media Network
Follow US
359 S. Kalamazoo Mall, Ste 300, Kalamazoo, MI 49007 | 269.343.2211 | Tax ID #38-2564383
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?